There is a viewpoint that suggests the primary aim of scientific research should be to improve human lives. I strongly disagree with this notion, as I believe that the fundamental purpose of science is the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake, and its scope should extend beyond human welfare to include the wellbeing of all species on Earth.

The main reason I reject the idea that scientific efforts should be solely focused on enhancing human life is that prioritizing pure scientific inquiry often yields broader and more impactful results. At its heart, science seeks to unravel the mysteries of the universe, which can later lead to human benefits. However, narrowing the focus to immediate practical outcomes can limit the breadth of exploration. Historically, the pursuit of knowledge without specific applications in mind has led to some of the most transformative discoveries. For example, Fleming’s curiosity-driven study of mould properties led to the discovery of penicillin, which transformed medicine and saved countless lives.

Moreover, scientific research should aim to improve conditions for all living creatures, not just humans. A human-centered approach overlooks the interconnectedness of ecosystems and the rights of other species to flourish. Many of today’s environmental challenges, such as climate change and loss of biodiversity, demand a scientific approach that supports the entire biosphere. In my experience volunteering with a marine conservation project, studying coral bleaching was essential in developing strategies that benefit a wide range of marine species.

In conclusion, I strongly disagree with the notion that the primary goal of scientific research should be the enhancement of human life. The true purpose of science is to expand our understanding and apply it to the greater good of all life on Earth. In doing so, scientific inquiry sustains the balance of ecosystems and safeguards the welfare of all flora and fauna.